ADP Trends Zach Ertz
ADP Trends Matt Prater
OWN/START Matt Prater
Expert Consensus Zach Ertz
Expert Consensus Matt Prater
Breakdown Zach Ertz
Breakdown Matt Prater
- Including a kicker in a trade is rather pointless. Don't dare give up a positional player for a kicker.
- Experts rank this player at 7th among K's. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 24th with 124.00 total points (7.29 avg).
- Currently 68 points behind the leader: Harrison Butker
- He should be doing much better than this. You might be able to get him now for a discount.
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 7.3.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
- FGA: 24, FGM: 23, XP: 34
Overview
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Injury Zach Ertz
No Injury Reported
Injury Matt Prater
No Injury Reported
Similar Picks Zach Ertz
Similar Picks Matt Prater
Rating Zach Ertz
Rating Matt Prater
Career Zach Ertz
RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | PHI | 14 | 56 | 36 | 469 | 13.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2014 | PHI | 16 | 88 | 58 | 702 | 12.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2015 | PHI | 15 | 112 | 75 | 853 | 11.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2016 | PHI | 14 | 106 | 78 | 816 | 10.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2017 | PHI | 14 | 110 | 74 | 824 | 11.1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2018 | PHI | 16 | 156 | 116 | 1163 | 10.0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2019 | PHI | 15 | 134 | 88 | 916 | 10.4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2020 | PHI | 11 | 72 | 36 | 335 | 9.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2021 | PHI | 16 | 112 | 74 | 763 | 10.3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||
2022 | ARI | 10 | 69 | 47 | 406 | 8.6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2023 | ARI | 7 | 43 | 27 | 187 | 6.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 13 | 84 | 52 | 501 | 9.6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |||
Totals | 149 | 1058 | 709 | 7434 | 10.5 | 46 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Career Matt Prater
YEAR | TEAM | GP | FGA | FGM | PCT | XPA | XPM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | DEN | 16 | 34 | 25 | 74% | 40 | 39 |
2009 | DEN | 16 | 35 | 30 | 86% | 32 | 32 |
2010 | DEN | 12 | 18 | 16 | 89% | 29 | 28 |
2011 | DEN | 15 | 24 | 18 | 75% | 30 | 30 |
2012 | DEN | 16 | 33 | 27 | 82% | 55 | 55 |
2013 | DEN | 16 | 26 | 25 | 96% | 75 | 75 |
2014 | DET | 11 | 26 | 21 | 81% | 21 | 21 |
2015 | DET | 16 | 24 | 22 | 92% | 39 | 36 |
2016 | DET | 16 | 36 | 31 | 86% | 33 | 31 |
2017 | DET | 16 | 35 | 30 | 86% | 41 | 40 |
2018 | DET | 16 | 32 | 28 | 88% | 30 | 30 |
2019 | DET | 16 | 31 | 26 | 84% | 36 | 35 |
2020 | DET | 16 | 28 | 21 | 75% | 41 | 38 |
2021 | ARI | 16 | 37 | 30 | 81% | 49 | 47 |
2022 | ARI | 13 | 25 | 22 | 88% | 18 | 17 |
2023 | ARI | 16 | 33 | 28 | 85% | 23 | 22 |
3-YEAR AVG | 15 | 30 | 26 | 86% | 29 | 28 | |
Totals | 247 | 477 | 400 | 84% | 592 | 576 |