Performance Drew Brees
| TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season stats based on the past 7 days | |||||
| TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season stats based on the past 14 days | |||||
Performance Philip Rivers
| YDS | CMP% | TD | INT | RUSH YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 7 days | |||||
| YDS | CMP% | TD | INT | RUSH YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 14 days | |||||
Redzone Touches Drew Brees
Redzone information only applies to RB, WR, TE.
Redzone Touches Philip Rivers
Redzone information only applies to RB, WR, TE.
OWN/START Philip Rivers
Expert Consensus Drew Brees
Expert Consensus Philip Rivers
Breakdown Drew Brees
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Overview
Bonus Qualities
Breakdown Philip Rivers
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Overview
Bonus Qualities
Injury Drew Brees
No Injury Reported
Injury Philip Rivers
No Injury Reported
Matchups Drew Brees
Week 2
n/a VS n/a
| TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | ||||||
| Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Matchups Philip Rivers
Week 2
n/a VS n/a
| TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | ||||||
| Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Rating Drew Brees
Rating Philip Rivers
Career Drew Brees
Career Philip Rivers
| PASS | RUSH | |||||||||
| YR | TM | GP | YD | CMP% | TD | INT | RAT | YD | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | SD | 16 | 4004 | 65% | 34 | 11 | 105.5 | 84 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | SD | 16 | 4254 | 65% | 28 | 9 | 104.4 | 50 | 1 | 3 |
| 2010 | SD | 16 | 4710 | 66% | 30 | 13 | 101.8 | 52 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | SD | 15 | 4314 | 62% | 24 | 19 | 86.6 | 39 | 1 | 4 |
| 2012 | SD | 16 | 3917 | 65% | 29 | 16 | 90.8 | 37 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | SD | 16 | 4478 | 70% | 32 | 11 | 105.4 | 72 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | SD | 16 | 4286 | 67% | 31 | 18 | 93.8 | 104 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | SD | 16 | 4793 | 66% | 29 | 13 | 93.8 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | SD | 16 | 4390 | 60% | 33 | 21 | 87.9 | 35 | 0 | 8 |
| 2017 | LAC | 16 | 4515 | 63% | 28 | 10 | 96.0 | -2 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | LAC | 16 | 4308 | 68% | 32 | 12 | 105.5 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | LAC | 16 | 4615 | 66% | 23 | 20 | 88.5 | 29 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | IND | 16 | 4478 | 67% | 26 | 11 | 96.7 | -9 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | IND | 3 | 544 | 63% | 4 | 3 | 80.2 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| ON PACE | 54 | 9792 | 63% | 72 | 54 | 80.2 | -108 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3-YEAR AVG | 7 | 1674 | 67% | 10 | 5 | 94.5 | -5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Totals | 212 | 57606 | 65% | 383 | 187 | 96.1 | 520 | 2 | 39 | |
