Performance Isiah Pacheco
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 59 | 3.3 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 59 | 3.3 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Performance Mike Williams
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Redzone Touches Isiah Pacheco
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | DET | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
2 | @JAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
3 | CHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
4 | @NYJ | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
5 | @MIN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
6 | DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
7 | LAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
8 | @DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
9 | MIA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
11 | BYE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
12 | PHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
13 | @LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
14 | @GB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
15 | BUF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
16 | @NE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
17 | LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
18 | CIN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
19 | @LAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
20 | MIA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
21 | @BUF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
22 | @BAL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
Redzone Touches Mike Williams
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | BUF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
2 | @DAL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
3 | NE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
OWN/START Mike Williams
Expert Consensus Isiah Pacheco
Expert Consensus Mike Williams
Breakdown Isiah Pacheco
- Just about every team utilizies the dreaded 'running backs by comittee' policy. Two solid #1 starters are hard to find.
- Experts don't even rank him among RB's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 8th with 223.20 total points (10.63 avg).
- Currently 171.1 points behind the leader: Christian McCaffrey
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 10.6.
- Top 20 in receptions and is currently ranked 19th among RB.
- Top 25 in targets and is currently ranked 22nd among RB.
- Top 15 in Rec TDs with 2 and is currently ranked 15th among RB.
- Top 10 in red zone targets and is currently ranked 9th among RB.
- Top 6 in red zone receptions and is currently ranked 5th among RB.
- Top 10 in red zone attempts and is currently ranked 8th among RB.
- Top 25 in rush attempts with 205 (12.06 per game) and is currently ranked 22nd among RB.
- Top 20 in rush yards with 935 (55.00 per game) and is currently ranked 18th among RB.
- Top 15 in rush tds with 7 (0.41 per game) and is currently ranked 15th among RB.
- Played in 6 more games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Rush Yards: +513, Rush AVG: -0.4 Rush TDs: +7, Receptions: +45, Rec Yards: +192 Rec TDs: +2,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- RUSH ATT: 175, RUSH YDS: 900, RUSH TDS: 9, REC: 45, REC YDS: 300, REC TDS: 3
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Breakdown Mike Williams
- Experts don't even rank him among WR's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 112th with 31.20 total points (10.40 avg).
- Currently 248.5 points behind the leader: CeeDee Lamb
- He has missed playing in at least 2 games but is not listed on the injury report as of today. Check out his player news to see if he has any nagging injuries.
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 10.4.
- Ranked 118th in targets and is currently among WR.
- Top 100 in Rec TDs with 1, though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 100th among WR.
- Top 100 in rush yards with 3 (1.00 per game), though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 81st among WR.
- Played in 14 less games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Receptions: -45, Rec Yards: -702 Rec TDs: -5,
- Catches per game are very high so watch out!
- Known to break out for big gains. If your league has bonus points for long REC TDs then this guy would be great to have.
- REC: 0, REC YDS: 0, REC TDS: 0
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Injury Isiah Pacheco
No Injury Reported
Injury Mike Williams
No Injury Reported
Matchups Isiah Pacheco
Week 1
Kansas City Chiefs VS Detroit Lions
PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23.71 | 289.10 | 25 | 19 | 51 | 1 | 0.57 |
Compare to same point last season |
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 18th with 122.00 total points (5.81 avg).
- Currently 59 points behind the leader: Ravens DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 5.8.
Defensive Stats
- Top 2 in rush defense with 1509 (88.76 per game) and is currently ranked 2nd among DST.
- Ranked 29th in pass defense with 4562 (268.35 per game).
- Top 12 in interceptions with 16 (0.94 per game) and currently ranked 11th among DST.
- One of the worst in points against with 23.24 per game and currently ranked 23rd among DST.
- Currently ranked 27th in Total TDs with 1 (0.06 per game) among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: -137.31, Turnovers: +4 Sacks: +16, INTs: +7, TDs: -1, Points Allowed: -4.64,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
Season Outlook
- SACK: 41, INT: 11, TDS: 3, PA/G: 26.7, YDS/G: 416.9
Matchups Mike Williams
Week 1
New York Jets VS Buffalo Bills
PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18.60 | 277.80 | 34 | 20 | 56 | 3 | 3.71 |
Compare to same point last season |
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 4th with 169.00 total points (8.45 avg).
- Currently 12 points behind the leader: Ravens DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 8.5.
Defensive Stats
- Top 8 in total yards against with 326.82 per game and is currently ranked 8th among DST.
- Top 4 in turnovers with 30 (1.76 per game) and is currently ranked 3rd among DST.
- Ranked 15th in rush defense with 1880 (110.59 per game).
- Top 6 in pass defense with 3676 (216.24 per game) and is currently ranked 6th among DST.
- Top 4 in sacks with 54 (3.18 per game) and currently ranked 4th among DST.
- Top 4 in interceptions with 18 (1.06 per game) and currently ranked 3rd among DST.
- Top 4 in points against with 18.29 per game and currently ranked 4th among DST.
- Top 8 in Total TDs with 3 (0.18 per game) and currently ranked 7th among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: -44.08, Turnovers: +9 Sacks: +3, INTs: +6, TDs: +2, Points Allowed: +1.66,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
Season Outlook
- SACK: 43, INT: 15, TDS: 5, PA/G: 18.3, YDS/G: 323.3
Rating Isiah Pacheco
Rating Mike Williams
Career Isiah Pacheco
RUSH | RECEIVING | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | KC | 16 | 170 | 830 | 4.9 | 5 | 14 | 13 | 130 | 10.0 | 0 | ||
2023 | KC | 14 | 205 | 935 | 4.6 | 7 | 49 | 44 | 244 | 5.5 | 2 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 17 | 199 | 943 | 4.8 | 6 | 35 | 32 | 220 | 7.0 | 1 | |||
Totals | 37 | 478 | 2199 | 4.6 | 15 | 82 | 75 | 499 | 6.7 | 2 |
Career Mike Williams
RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | SEA | 1 | 0 | 11 | 145 | 13.2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2011 | TB | 1 | 0 | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
2012 | TB | 9 | 79 | 38 | 560 | 14.7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2013 | TB | 6 | 40 | 22 | 216 | 9.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2014 | BUF | 6 | 19 | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2017 | LAC | 9 | 23 | 11 | 95 | 8.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2018 | LAC | 16 | 66 | 43 | 664 | 15.4 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 4 | 1 | ||
2019 | LAC | 15 | 91 | 49 | 1001 | 20.4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
2020 | LAC | 14 | 85 | 48 | 756 | 15.8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
2021 | LAC | 16 | 129 | 76 | 1146 | 15.1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2022 | LAC | 13 | 93 | 63 | 895 | 14.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2023 | LAC | 3 | 26 | 19 | 249 | 13.1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 14 | 101 | 61 | 922 | 15.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
Totals | 109 | 651 | 393 | 5935 | 15.1 | 39 | 12 | 37 | 3.1 | 1 |