Performance Isiah Pacheco
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 26 | 2.6 | 0 | 5 | 59 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22 | 121 | 5.5 | 0 | 6 | 65 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Performance Mike Williams
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Redzone Touches Isiah Pacheco
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | @ARI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
2 | LAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
3 | @IND | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
4 | @TB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
5 | LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
6 | BUF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
7 | @SF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
9 | BYE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
10 | TEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
11 | JAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
12 | @LAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
13 | LAR | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
14 | @CIN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
15 | @DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
16 | @HOU | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
17 | SEA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
18 | DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
20 | @LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
21 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
Redzone Touches Mike Williams
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
2 | @KC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
3 | JAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
4 | @HOU | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
5 | @CLE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
6 | DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
7 | SEA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
9 | BYE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
10 | @ATL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
11 | @SF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
12 | KC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
13 | @ARI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
14 | @LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
15 | MIA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
16 | TEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
17 | @IND | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
18 | LAR | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
19 | @DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
OWN/START Mike Williams
Expert Consensus Isiah Pacheco
Expert Consensus Mike Williams
Breakdown Isiah Pacheco
- Just about every team utilizies the dreaded 'running backs by comittee' policy. Two solid #1 starters are hard to find.
- Experts don't even rank him among RB's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 26th with 140.60 total points (7.40 avg).
- Currently 141.4 points behind the leader: Austin Ekeler
- Average points in the past two weeks have increased by 1.1 PPG.
- Top 50 in receptions and is currently ranked 50th among RB.
- Top 75 in targets, though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 59th among RB.
- Top 100 in Rec TDs with 0, though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 78th among RB.
- Top 20 in red zone attempts and is currently ranked 19th among RB.
- Top 25 in rush attempts with 192 (10.11 per game) and is currently ranked 26th among RB.
- Top 20 in rush yards with 951 (50.05 per game) and is currently ranked 17th among RB.
- Top 35 in rush tds with 5 (0.26 per game) and is currently ranked 26th among RB.
- Played in 19 more games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Rush Yards: +951, Rush AVG: +5 Rush TDs: +5, Receptions: +19, Rec Yards: +195 Rec TDs: EVEN,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- RUSH ATT: 100, RUSH YDS: 417, RUSH TDS: 3, REC: 22, REC YDS: 169, REC TDS: 1
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Breakdown Mike Williams
- Experts don't even rank him among WR's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 34th with 113.50 total points (6.31 avg).
- Currently 131.78 points behind the leader: Justin Jefferson
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 6.3.
- Top 50 in receptions and is currently ranked 41st among WR.
- Top 50 in targets and is currently ranked 44th among WR.
- Top 35 in red zone targets and is currently ranked 27th among WR.
- Top 35 in reception yards with 895 and 14.21 YPC and is currently ranked 27th among WR.
- Top 35 in Rec TDs with 4 and is currently ranked 35th among WR.
- Played in 15 more games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Receptions: +41, Rec Yards: +600 Rec TDs: EVEN,
- Known to break out for big gains. If your league has bonus points for long REC TDs then this guy would be great to have.
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- REC: 73, REC YDS: 1091, REC TDS: 8
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Injury Isiah Pacheco
No Injury Reported
Injury Mike Williams
No Injury Reported
Matchups Isiah Pacheco
Week 4
Kansas City Chiefs @ Tampa Bay Bucs
TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.35 | ||||||
Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 24th with 102.00 total points (5.67 avg).
- Currently 84 points behind the leader: Patriots DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 5.7.
Defensive Stats
- Top 10 in total yards against with 324.56 per game and is currently ranked 9th among DST.
- Ranked 15th in rush defense with 2054 (114.11 per game).
- Top 12 in pass defense with 3788 (210.44 per game) and is currently ranked 11th among DST.
- Top 10 in sacks with 46 (2.56 per game) and currently ranked 10th among DST.
- Top 20 in points against with 21.61 per game and currently ranked 19th among DST.
- Currently ranked 30th in Total TDs with 1 (0.06 per game) among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: +75.45, Turnovers: +3 Sacks: +24, INTs: -3, TDs: -1, Points Allowed: -2.61,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
Season Outlook
- SACK: 44, INT: 15, TDS: 3, PA/G: 22.1, YDS/G: 352.2
Matchups Mike Williams
Week 4
Los Angeles Chargers @ Houston Texans
TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.72 | ||||||
Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 10th with 118.00 total points (6.94 avg).
- Currently 68 points behind the leader: Patriots DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 6.9.
Defensive Stats
- Top 8 in turnovers with 28 (1.65 per game) and is currently ranked 8th among DST.
- Ranked 32nd in rush defense with 2894 (170.24 per game).
- Top 10 in pass defense with 3775 (222.06 per game) and is currently ranked 10th among DST.
- Top 10 in interceptions with 16 (0.94 per game) and currently ranked 10th among DST.
- One of the worst in points against with 24.71 per game and currently ranked 24th among DST.
- Currently ranked 18th in Total TDs with 2 (0.12 per game) among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: -10.21, Turnovers: +23 Sacks: +26, INTs: +12, TDs: +2, Points Allowed: -3.79,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
Season Outlook
- SACK: 34, INT: 11, TDS: 3, PA/G: 28.3, YDS/G: 408.4
Rating Isiah Pacheco
Rating Mike Williams
Career Isiah Pacheco
RUSH | RECEIVING | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | KC | 16 | 162 | 766 | 4.7 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 130 | 10.0 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 8 | 81 | 383 | 4.7 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 65 | 10.0 | 0 | |||
Totals | 19 | 192 | 951 | 5 | 5 | 21 | 19 | 195 | 10.3 | 0 |
Career Mike Williams
RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | SEA | 1 | 0 | 11 | 145 | 13.2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2011 | TB | 1 | 0 | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
2012 | TB | 9 | 79 | 38 | 560 | 14.7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2013 | TB | 6 | 40 | 22 | 216 | 9.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2014 | BUF | 6 | 19 | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2017 | LAC | 9 | 23 | 11 | 95 | 8.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2018 | LAC | 16 | 66 | 43 | 664 | 15.4 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 4 | 1 | ||
2019 | LAC | 15 | 91 | 49 | 1001 | 20.4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
2020 | LAC | 14 | 85 | 48 | 756 | 15.8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
2021 | LAC | 15 | 112 | 67 | 1027 | 15.3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2022 | LAC | 12 | 88 | 59 | 863 | 14.6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 14 | 101 | 61 | 922 | 15.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
Totals | 106 | 625 | 374 | 5686 | 15.2 | 38 | 11 | 34 | 3.1 | 1 |