Performance Chase Claypool
Fantasy Chart Loading...
| REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 7 days | ||||
| REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 14 days | ||||
Performance Zach Ertz
Fantasy Chart Loading...
| REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 7 days | ||||
| REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Season stats based on the past 14 days | ||||
Redzone Touches Chase Claypool
| REDZONE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
| 1 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 2 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 3 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 4 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 5 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 5 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 6 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 7 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 8 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 9 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 11 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 12 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 13 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 14 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 15 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 16 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 17 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 18 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
| 19 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
Redzone Touches Zach Ertz
| REDZONE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
| 1 | ARI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 2 | @DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 3 | BUF | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 4 | @PHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 5 | CHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 6 | @ATL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
| 7 | @NYG | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
OWN/START Zach Ertz
Expert Consensus Chase Claypool
Not Ranked
Average Ranking of Fantasy Experts
Expert Consensus Zach Ertz
Not Ranked
Average Ranking of Fantasy Experts
Breakdown Chase Claypool
- Experts don't even rank him among WR's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 188th with 2.60 total points (0.19 avg).
- Currently 277.1 points behind the leader: CeeDee Lamb
- Ranked 136th in targets and is currently among WR.
- He is top 75 in rush tds with 0 (0.00 per game), though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 70th among WR.
- Played in 2 more games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Receptions: -44, Rec Yards: -399 Rec TDs: -1,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- REC: 20, REC YDS: 200, REC TDS: 2
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Breakdown Zach Ertz
- Experts don't even rank him among TE's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 51st with 24.70 total points (3.53 avg).
- Currently 155.7 points behind the leader: Travis Kelce
- He has missed playing in at least 2 games but is not listed on the injury report as of today. Check out his player news to see if he has any nagging injuries.
- Decline in numbers lately by 3.5 PPG.
- Top 35 in receptions and is currently ranked 35th among TE.
- Top 35 in targets and is currently ranked 30th among TE.
- Top 35 in red zone targets and is currently ranked 33rd among TE.
- Top 50 in reception yards with 187 and 6.93 YPC and is currently ranked 47th among TE.
- Top 75 in Rec TDs with 1, though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 62nd among TE.
- Played in 6 less games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Receptions: -34, Rec Yards: -344 Rec TDs: -3,
- REC: 0, REC YDS: 0, REC TDS: 0
Overview
Receiving Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Injury Chase Claypool
No Injury Reported
Injury Zach Ertz
No Injury Reported
Matchups Chase Claypool
Week 1
n/a VS n/a
| TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | ||||||
| Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
- He has missed playing in at least 2 games but is not listed on the injury report as of today. Check out his player news to see if he has any nagging injuries.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Matchups Zach Ertz
Week 1
Washington Commanders VS Arizona Cardinals
| PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.76 | 369.41 | 17 | 11 | 33 | 1 | 0.33 |
| Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 31st with 65.00 total points (3.82 avg).
- Currently 116 points behind the leader: Ravens DST
- Decline in numbers lately by 3.8 PPG.
Defensive Stats
- Ranked 32nd in rush defense with 2434 (143.18 per game).
- Top 12 in pass defense with 3846 (226.24 per game) and is currently ranked 12th among DST.
- One of the worst in points against with 26.76 per game and currently ranked 31st among DST.
- Currently ranked 29th in Total TDs with 1 (0.06 per game) among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: -0.64999999999998, Turnovers: -5 Sacks: EVEN, INTs: -1, TDs: -5, Points Allowed: +0.23,
Season Outlook
- SACK: 36, INT: 11, TDS: 2, PA/G: 28.1, YDS/G: 370.7
Rating Chase Claypool
3.17
FantasySP Player Rating
Rating Zach Ertz
0.00
FantasySP Player Rating
Career Chase Claypool
| RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
| YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | PIT | 16 | 116 | 67 | 932 | 13.9 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 1.6 | 2 | ||
| 2021 | PIT | 15 | 105 | 59 | 860 | 14.6 | 2 | 14 | 96 | 6.9 | 0 | ||
| 2022 | PIT | 15 | 79 | 46 | 451 | 9.8 | 1 | 9 | 59 | 6.6 | 0 | ||
| 2023 | CHI | 7 | 21 | 8 | 77 | 9.6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3-YEAR AVG | 12 | 68 | 37 | 462 | 12.4 | 1 | 8 | 52 | 6.7 | 0 | |||
| Totals | 54 | 321 | 180 | 2320 | 12.9 | 15 | 33 | 171 | 5.2 | 2 | |||
Career Zach Ertz
| RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
| YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | PHI | 14 | 56 | 36 | 469 | 13.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2014 | PHI | 16 | 88 | 58 | 702 | 12.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2015 | PHI | 15 | 112 | 75 | 853 | 11.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2016 | PHI | 14 | 106 | 78 | 816 | 10.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2017 | PHI | 14 | 110 | 74 | 824 | 11.1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2018 | PHI | 16 | 156 | 116 | 1163 | 10.0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2019 | PHI | 15 | 134 | 88 | 916 | 10.4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2020 | PHI | 11 | 72 | 36 | 335 | 9.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2021 | PHI | 16 | 112 | 74 | 763 | 10.3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 2022 | ARI | 10 | 69 | 47 | 406 | 8.6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2023 | ARI | 7 | 43 | 27 | 187 | 6.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3-YEAR AVG | 13 | 84 | 52 | 501 | 9.6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |||
| Totals | 149 | 1058 | 709 | 7434 | 10.5 | 46 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |||
