Performance David Montgomery
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Performance Ryan Tannehill
YDS | CMP% | TD | INT | RUSH YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
YDS | CMP% | TD | INT | RUSH YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Redzone Touches David Montgomery
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | @KC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
2 | SEA | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
3 | ATL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
4 | @GB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
5 | CAR | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
6 | @TB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
7 | @BAL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
8 | LV | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
10 | BYE | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
11 | @LAC | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
12 | CHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
13 | GB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
14 | @NO | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
15 | @CHI | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
16 | DEN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
17 | @MIN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
18 | @DAL | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
19 | MIN | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
20 | LAR | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
21 | TB | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
Redzone Touches Ryan Tannehill
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
2 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
3 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
4 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
5 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
6 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
8 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
9 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
10 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
11 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
12 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
13 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
14 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
15 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
16 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
17 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 | |
18 | 🔓 | 🔓 | 🔓 |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
OWN/START Ryan Tannehill
Expert Consensus David Montgomery
Expert Consensus Ryan Tannehill
Breakdown David Montgomery
- Just about every team utilizies the dreaded 'running backs by comittee' policy. Two solid #1 starters are hard to find.
- Experts rank this player at 14th among RB's. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 6th with 226.00 total points (11.30 avg).
- Currently 168.3 points behind the leader: Christian McCaffrey
- He is putting up better numbers than the experts expected him to.
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 11.3.
- Top 75 in receptions, though that isn't saying much, and is currently ranked 57th among RB.
- Top 50 in targets and is currently ranked 50th among RB.
- Ranked 125th in Rec TDs among RB.
- Top 6 in red zone attempts and is currently ranked 5th among RB.
- Top 15 in rush attempts with 219 (12.88 per game) and is currently ranked 15th among RB.
- Top 10 in rush yards with 1015 (59.71 per game) and is currently ranked 9th among RB.
- Top 6 in rush tds with 13 (0.76 per game) and is currently ranked 4th among RB.
- Played in 3 more games this year than last year.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Rush Yards: +306, Rush AVG: +0.7 Rush TDs: +8, Receptions: -14, Rec Yards: -166 Rec TDs: -1,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- RUSH ATT: 175, RUSH YDS: 950, RUSH TDS: 18, REC: 20, REC YDS: 225, REC TDS: 3
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Breakdown Ryan Tannehill
Injury David Montgomery
No Injury Reported
Injury Ryan Tannehill
No Injury Reported
Matchups David Montgomery
Week 1
Detroit Lions @ Kansas City Chiefs
PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16.55 | 239.86 | 24 | 11 | 66 | 2 | 2.80 |
Compare to same point last season |
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 4th with 169.00 total points (7.68 avg).
- Currently 12 points behind the leader: Ravens DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 7.7.
Defensive Stats
- Top 4 in total yards against with 310.41 per game and is currently ranked 3rd among DST.
- Ranked 18th in rush defense with 1925 (113.24 per game).
- Top 4 in pass defense with 3352 (197.18 per game) and is currently ranked 4th among DST.
- Top 2 in sacks with 57 (3.35 per game) and currently ranked 2nd among DST.
- Top 2 in points against with 17.29 per game and currently ranked 2nd among DST.
- Top 14 in Total TDs with 2 (0.12 per game) and currently ranked 14th among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: -123.96, Turnovers: +7 Sacks: +16, INTs: +2, TDs: -1, Points Allowed: -6.39,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
Season Outlook
- SACK: 45, INT: 13, TDS: 2, PA/G: 23.1, YDS/G: 348.7
Matchups Ryan Tannehill
Week 1
n/a VS n/a
TACK | SOLO | INT | SACK | DEF | TD | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | ||||||
Compare to same point last season | ||||||
Overview
- He has missed playing in at least 2 games but is not listed on the injury report as of today. Check out his player news to see if he has any nagging injuries.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years:
Rating David Montgomery
Rating Ryan Tannehill
Career David Montgomery
RUSH | RECEIVING | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | CHI | 16 | 242 | 889 | 3.7 | 6 | 35 | 25 | 185 | 7.4 | 1 | ||
2020 | CHI | 16 | 259 | 1101 | 4.3 | 8 | 69 | 54 | 438 | 8.1 | 2 | ||
2021 | CHI | 13 | 225 | 849 | 3.8 | 7 | 51 | 42 | 301 | 7.2 | 0 | ||
2022 | CHI | 16 | 201 | 801 | 4.0 | 5 | 40 | 34 | 316 | 9.3 | 1 | ||
2023 | DET | 14 | 219 | 1015 | 4.6 | 13 | 24 | 16 | 117 | 7.3 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 14 | 212 | 875 | 4.1 | 8 | 38 | 31 | 245 | 8.0 | 0 | |||
Totals | 78 | 1185 | 4838 | 4.1 | 41 | 226 | 177 | 1402 | 7.9 | 4 |
Career Ryan Tannehill
PASS | RUSH | |||||||||
YR | TM | GP | YD | CMP% | TD | INT | RAT | YD | TD | FUM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | MIA | 16 | 3294 | 58% | 12 | 13 | 76.1 | 197 | 2 | 4 |
2013 | MIA | 16 | 3913 | 60% | 24 | 17 | 81.7 | 238 | 1 | 5 |
2014 | MIA | 16 | 4045 | 66% | 27 | 12 | 92.8 | 317 | 1 | 2 |
2015 | MIA | 16 | 4210 | 62% | 24 | 12 | 88.8 | 141 | 1 | 3 |
2016 | MIA | 13 | 2997 | 67% | 19 | 12 | 93.5 | 164 | 1 | 5 |
2018 | MIA | 11 | 1979 | 64% | 17 | 9 | 92.7 | 145 | 0 | 9 |
2019 | TEN | 12 | 2742 | 70% | 22 | 6 | 117.5 | 185 | 4 | 6 |
2020 | TEN | 16 | 3984 | 66% | 34 | 8 | 105.3 | 272 | 7 | 1 |
2021 | TEN | 16 | 3734 | 67% | 21 | 14 | 89.6 | 270 | 7 | 4 |
2022 | TEN | 12 | 2536 | 65% | 13 | 6 | 94.6 | 98 | 2 | 2 |
2023 | TEN | 9 | 1616 | 65% | 4 | 7 | 78.5 | 74 | 1 | 0 |
3-YEAR AVG | 12 | 2573 | 66% | 12 | 9 | 88.6 | 148 | 3 | 2 | |
Totals | 155 | 35050 | 64% | 217 | 116 | 91.2 | 2101 | 27 | 41 |